![boris graffiti 6.1 boris graffiti 6.1](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WfBa10Jdv2g/maxresdefault.jpg)
- Boris graffiti 6.1 how to#
- Boris graffiti 6.1 full#
- Boris graffiti 6.1 pro#
- Boris graffiti 6.1 software#
- Boris graffiti 6.1 code#
Boris graffiti 6.1 code#
I'm not sure if Graffiti operates on a sub-pixel basis within Premiere 6, because I am uncertain how 'independently' it operates from the core code of Premiere 6 itself.
![boris graffiti 6.1 boris graffiti 6.1](https://dch81km8r5tow.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/ULTRA-WIDE-GOOD-GUY-BORIS-2.jpg)
I'm not an expert on this, but I can assure you that the difference is quite noticeable. Basically, sub-pixel rendering means that the editing system has the ability to make scrolls and special effects much smoother in motion, because it can calculate them on the basis of much smaller increments, even though the physical number of display pixels remains limited to the standard size. Sub-pixel rendering is dependent upon your NLE's underlying code and codec - it's not a simple 'setting', unfortunately.
![boris graffiti 6.1 boris graffiti 6.1](https://www.lookae.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Boris-Graffiti.jpg)
Re sub pixel rendering, what can i do to achieve it apart from text size and font? Is it a setting in the NLE program? I'm not quite aware what it is.
Boris graffiti 6.1 pro#
However, Premiere Pro was definitely a huge improvement on Premiere 6, so I suggest you get familiar with Pro as soon as possible.
Boris graffiti 6.1 full#
I must confess that I am not a big fan of Premiere, full stop. not integrating existing interlaced source files into the composite), then it is worthwhile rendering it as true progressive.ītw, i used Premiere 6 for this project because only recently got the pro version. I would suggest that if you are ever generating a 'virgin' composite (i.e. This will obviously vary from project to project, though, so it is not always beneficial, and, if your original source is interlaced, then there is potential for introducing unwanted artifacts during the de-interlacing process. The benefit of encoding progressively is that your DVD will look much better if it needs to be played on computers as well as on televisions. Yes, the player will do that automatically. It allows you to create animations for titles and graphics, while Magic Bullet Looks provides a collection of film styles that can help set the mood. Boris Graffiti is a gold standard for title animation in Adobe Premiere Pro. Do you think de-interlaced is better? Doesn't it need to be interlaced again while being played? » boris graffiti 6.1 boris graffiti 6 at UpdateStar Boris Graffiti For Corel Brushes. I used interlaced because I need to play it on an interlaced tv.
Boris graffiti 6.1 how to#
If you need to know how to use it, there are some tutorials () on the homepage. I suggest you try the demo () first, though, just to see if it satisfies your requirements. Poor title/character generators do not utilise sub-pixel rendering engines, whch leads to very jumpy/uneven scrolls across the screen, particularly when slowed down (Premiere 6 used to be pretty bad for this, IMHO).īoris Graffiti does a great job. This is a common error with DVD menus, for example).ģ) Sub-pixel rendering. not so small that they appear differently according to whether the upper or lower field is being displayed - having titles so small means that the characters appear to 'move'. Generally, a combination of the following three factors would go a very long way to reducing artifacts on titles/characters (and, of course, progressive rendering and encoding is always a factor, but I shall assume that you have good reason for going wth interlaced):Ģ) Making titles/characters a sensible size (i.e. I believe that what you are referring to is 'jaggies', which might be exacerbated by interlacing artifacts. which starts where the 'needs' list ends.It's a little difficult to ascertain exactly what you mean - your subjective description might not match my interpretation of it, so we might be talking at crossed purposes.
Boris graffiti 6.1 software#
And wants have to join a long list of things. 04- Boris FX Title Toolkit 1.0 05- Buena Software Au Naturel 1.1.1 06- Buena Software Dissolve Factory 1.01 07- Buena Software Effect Essentials 1.6.1 08- Buena Software Swatch Buckler 1.0. I think, for me, its more a case of want than need. For trickier stuff - like a logo name rotating round a globe for example, I use BluffTitler. Boris FX Creative Tools for Editing, Visual Effects, and Motion Graphics. and neat and simple I can do with TDK - or a photo editor even. I far prefer neat and simple to jazzy and flourished. how jazzy does one want every title to be? Very few. The question I have to satisfy for me is.
![boris graffiti 6.1 boris graffiti 6.1](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/1851F/production/_102951699_img-20180813-wa0001.jpg)
Heroglyph seems good, but when analysing many of the title effects (but not all of course), I reckon they could be done using Liquid's FX on TDK titles. I've tried Graffiti, and I am now trying Heroglyph.īoth are good - Graffiti probably far more sophisticated and, for me, a bit of a steeper learning curve. Very good, and very cheap compared with the so-called 'pro' products. It looks like Impact was designed for Serif's own Video editor - does it 'plug in' to Liquid? I've used Serif stuff a lot in the past - their Publisher programs, mainly.